Week

With the following MWE: \documentclass[tikz,border=5pt]{standalone} \usepackage{tikzpeople} \begin{document} \begin{tikzpicture} \node[businessman, minimum size=1.5cm] {}; \end{tikzpicture} \end{document} However, in the terminal output, we know that: Missing character: There is no * in font nullfont! Missing character: There is no 4 in font nullfont! Missing character: There is no . in font nullfont! Missing character: There is no 7 in font nullfont! Missing character: There is no 0 in font nullfont! Missing character: There is no 2 in font nullfont! Missing character: There is no 9 in font nullfont! Missing character: There is no 4 in font nullfont! Missing character: There is no p in font nullfont! Missing character: There is no t in font nullfont! Is that a bug with tikzpeople? Any quick fix to prevent this?

I am attempting to do a faded (partially-transparent) picture that is "outlined" at three different levels of opacity/color mixing. These should form the "convex boundary" (similar to that called for in "padded boundary of convex hull") of the original path with several different values of the "padding." The shape will, in general, be very complex (i.e., composed of many, many segments). Essentially, I want (almost) the inverse of this: \documentclass[tikz]{standalone} \usepackage{worldflags} \begin{document} \begin{tikzpicture} \pic [country=PT,length=4cm,width=4.5cm,framewidth=0pt] at (0.5,1.25) {worldflag}; \path [save path=\mypath] (0,0) -- (1,0.5) -- (1.5,1) -- (1,2) -- (0.5,1.5) -- (-0.25,2.5) -- (-0.5,0.5) -- cycle; \path [use path=\mypath,draw=black,line width=1.5cm,line join=round,opacity=0.05]; \path [use path=\mypath,draw=black,line width=0.4cm,line join=round,opacity=0.2]; \path [use path=\mypath,draw=black,line width=0.1cm,line join=round,opacity=0.4]; \path [use path=\mypath,fill=black,opacity=1]; \end{tikzpicture} \end{document} By "inverse" I mean that everywhere that is black in this image should be transparent, everything that is gray should be that % transparent, and everything outside the outermost boundary (the very slightly shaded region around the outside) should be clipped away or be filled with a background color. Note that I used the flag of Portugal as my picture here, but it can be any arbitrary image or drawing (assuming what I want to do is possible). I have tried using the nfold library (technically the offsetpath PGF library), but it has issues with concave shapes that are offset: \documentclass[tikz]{standalone} \usetikzlibrary{nfold} \usepackage{worldflags} \begin{document} \begin{tikzpicture} \coordinate (a) at (2,1); \coordinate (b) at (2.5,0.25); \coordinate (c) at (3,0.75); \coordinate (d) at (3.5,0); \coordinate (e) at (4,1); \coordinate (f) at (3,2); \path [save path=\island] (a) -- (b) -- (c) -- (d) -- (e) -- (f) -- cycle; \begin{scope} \pgfsetroundjoin \pgfoffsetpath{\island}{-5cm} \pgfpathclose \pgfusepath{clip} \pic [country=PT,width=12cm,at={(5cm,1cm)}] {worldflag}; \end{scope} \end{tikzpicture} I have also tried using the soft path (via spath3 and a subroutine I wrote myself using it), and that has similar issues with self-intersecting/overlapping offsets that occur with concave paths. Is there some way to say "use this drawing as a transparency mask" in TikZ? If not, I would appreciate referrals to libraries for which I should look through documentation. The final result should look something like this (without having to draw the outer path by hand, which I did to make this one):

I am trying to create a 3 hierarchy levels using maninblack at level 1, businessman at level 2 and dave at level 3, create empty vertical space below the 3rd level, which pushes the caption out of page. I want to know why this is happening and how to resolve it? \documentclass{article} \usepackage{tikz} \usepackage{tikzpeople} \usetikzlibrary{patterns} \usepgflibrary{patterns.meta} \usetikzlibrary{shapes,arrows, shadows, fadings} \usetikzlibrary{calc} \usetikzlibrary{decorations.text} \usetikzlibrary{intersections,backgrounds} \usetikzlibrary{decorations.pathreplacing} \begin{document} Introduction\\ \begin{figure}[htbp] \centering \begin{tikzpicture}[transform shape, scale=1] \draw (0,4.5)node[maninblack, anchor=center, minimum size=1.5cm](da){} (da.south)++(0,-0.01)node[below, align=center, fill=white](m){\small \texttt{CreditDefinitions.tex}} (da.south)++(0,-1.5)node[businessman, anchor=north, minimum size=1.5cm](hod2){} (hod2.south)++(0,-0.01)node[below, align=center](m) {\small Compile: Main.tex $\rightarrow$ $<$course-code1$>$, $<$course-code2$>$, $\cdots$, $<$course-codeN$>$} ++(0.05,-0.06)node(r){}++(-0.1,-0.045)node(t){} (hod2.east)++(0.5,0)node[businessman, fill opacity=0.8, anchor=west, minimum size=1.5cm](hod3){} (hod2.west)++(-0.5,0)node[businessman, fill opacity=0.8, anchor=east, minimum size=1.5cm](hod1){} ; \foreach \x in {1,2,3}{ \ifnum\x=2 \draw[-stealth] (da.south)++(0,-0.1)to($(hod\x.north)+(0,0.1)$); \else \draw [dashed, -stealth] (da.south)++(0,-0.1)to($(hod\x.north)+(0,0.1)$); \fi } \foreach \x in {1,...,5}{ \pgfmathparse{(2*\x-6)}\xdef\res{\pgfmathresult} \pgfmathparse{int(\x==3 || \x==4)} \ifnum\pgfmathresult=1 \draw (m.center)++(\res,-1)node[circle, fill=black, scale=0.2](d\x){}; \else \draw(m.center)++(\res,-1)node[dave, anchor=north, minimum size=1.2cm](exp\x){} ; \ifnum\x=5 \draw (exp\x.south)++(0,-0.25)node[below, align=center]{\small Expert N}; \pgfmathparse{(0.5+0.25)} \draw[-stealth]($(m.center)+(0,-0.1)$) to node[pos=\pgfmathresult, align=center, fill=white](ab\x){}(exp\x.north); \draw[-stealth, dashed](exp\x.north)++(-0.1,-0.1) to node[pos=\pgfmathresult, align=center, fill=white](ba\x){}($(m.center)+(0,-0.2)$); \draw[magenta, rounded corners, -stealth] (ab\x.center)node[circle, fill=magenta, scale=0.2]{}|-(r.center); \draw[violet, rounded corners, dashed, -stealth] (ab\x.center)++(0,-0.15)node[circle, fill=violet, scale=0.2]{}|-(t.center); \draw (ab\x-|r)++(0,0.2)node[right, color=magenta!80!black]{\small$<$course-codeN.tex$+$.bib$>$ $+$ Main.aux}; \draw (ab\x-|t)++(0,-0.4)node[left, color=violet!90!black]{\small$<$course-codeN.tex$+$.bib$>$}; \else \draw (exp\x.south)++(0,-0.25)node[below, align=center]{\small Expert \x}; \pgfmathparse{((\x*0.2)+0.2)} \draw[-stealth]($(m.center)+(0,-0.1)$) to node[pos=\pgfmathresult, align=center, fill=white](ab\x){} (exp\x.north); \draw[-stealth, dashed](exp\x.north)++(0.1,-0.1) to ($(m.center)+(0,-0.2)$); \draw[magenta, rounded corners, -stealth] (ab\x.center)node[circle, fill=magenta, scale=0.2]{}|-(r.center); \draw[violet, rounded corners, dashed, -stealth] (ab\x.center)++(0,-0.1)node[circle, fill=violet, scale=0.2]{}|-(t.center); \draw (ab\x.center-|r)++(0,0.5)node[right, color=magenta!80!black]{\small$<$course-code\x.tex$+$.bib$>$}; \draw (ab\x.center-|t)++(0,-0.1)node[left, color=violet!90!black]{\small$<$course-code\x.tex$+$.bib$>$}; \fi \fi } \end{tikzpicture} \caption{Illustration of Syllabus.cls Usage between HOD and subject experts}\label{fig:usage-illustration} \end{figure} \end{document}

I am trying to draw a graph (function of the form sin()*exp(-x^2)) inside an ellipse. How do I fit the graph inside the ellipse? I don't know how to scale and position it correctly. \documentclass[tikz]{standalone} \usepackage{tikz} \begin{document} \begin{tikzpicture} \draw[line width=1.2,fill=white] (1.5,0.5) ellipse (1.5 and 0.5); \draw[scale=0.1, domain=-20:20, samples=500, smooth, variable=\x, blue] (1.5,0.5) plot ({\x}, {0.5*sin(\x) * exp(-0.02*(\x)*(\x))}); \end{tikzpicture} \end{document} I want to produce something like:

As far as I know, the array environment needs to be in math mode. Not surprisingly, the following code fails on TeXlive 2025 on Overleaf with the error message "missing $ inserted". \documentclass{article} \begin{document} \begin{array}{c} x \end{array} \end{document} However, the same code compiles without any errors on my local TeXlive 2026. I haven't found any documentation on the change of the behavior of array from 2025 to 2026, so I am curious how it is able to run outside of math mode here. kpsewhich latex.ltx returns /usr/local/texlive/2026basic/texmf-dist/tex/latex/base/latex.ltx and kpsewhich array.sty returns /usr/local/texlive/2026basic/texmf-dist/tex/latex/tools/array.sty The file resides alone in a separate folder of its own. So, it seems that the standard texlive distribution is used and nothing else. Any ideas?

Is there a macro or something out there to convert the style of headings into Chinese? By which I mean, to make something like \documentclass{article} \usepackage{xeCJK} \setCJKmainfont{Noto Sans CJK TC} \begin{document} \section{甲章} \subsection{甲節} \subsection{乙節} \end{document} display 壹、甲章 一、甲節 二、乙節 Preferably, the numberings should be customizable between 壹貳, 一二, 甲乙, (一)(二), 1 2, and so on. For reference, I am using XeLaTeX and the xeCJK package on the Overleaf platform.

I would like to realize the following image in TikZ, which I had created very roughly in Adobe Illustrator. I am interested in understanding how to use TikZ 3d canvas to squash vectors along planes or lines. I would also like to see how it is used for labels. Here my attempt. See after the missing pieces. \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{bm} \usepackage{tikz} \usetikzlibrary{arrows.meta, angles, calc} \tikzset{rhtip/.tip={Triangle[line width=1pt, fill=white, length=9pt, width=9pt]}} \definecolor{vectorgreen}{RGB}{76, 181, 93} \definecolor{vectororange}{RGB}{235, 104, 38} \definecolor{vectorbrown}{RGB}{175, 110, 52} \definecolor{ellipseblue}{RGB}{112, 196, 172} \definecolor{spherepurple}{RGB}{155, 120, 200} \begin{document} \begin{tikzpicture}[>=latex] \coordinate (O) at (0,0); \draw[thin, black!70] (O) -- (0, 4.2) node[right, font=\Large] {$z$}; \draw[thin, black!70] (O) -- (5.5, -1.0) node[below right, font=\Large] {$y$}; \draw[thin, black!70] (O) -- (-4.8, -1.9) node[left, font=\Large] {$x$}; \coordinate (C) at (-2.2, -0.88); \fill[black] (C) circle (3.5pt) node[below=8pt, font=\Large] {$C$}; \begin{scope}[shift={(C)}, rotate=12] \draw[ellipseblue, line width=1.5pt] (0,0) ellipse (1.1 and 2.5); \draw[ellipseblue, line width=1.5pt, ->, >=latex] (131:1.1 and 2.5) -- (130:1.1 and 2.5); \draw[thin, black!60] (0,0) -- (225:1.1 and 2.5) node[midway, below right, font=\Large] {$r$}; \shade[ball color=spherepurple] (155:1.1 and 2.5) circle (0.18); \end{scope} \coordinate (P) at (4.0, 2.3); \coordinate (P_proj) at (4.0, -1.6); \draw[dashed, thick, black!80] (P) -- (P_proj); \draw[dashed, thick, black!80] (O) -- (P_proj); \draw[-rhtip, vectororange, line width=2pt] (O) -- (0, 1.9); \node[above right=2pt, font=\Large] at (0, 1.9) {$\bm{\beta}$}; \draw[-rhtip, vectorbrown, line width=2pt] (O) -- (-1.4, -0.56); \node[above=6pt, font=\Large] at (-0.7, -0.15) {$\mathbf{a}$}; \draw[-rhtip, vectorgreen, line width=2pt] (O) -- (3.9, 2.2); \node[below right=4pt, font=\Large] at (1.8, 1.1) {$\mathbf{R}$}; \fill[black] (P) circle (3.5pt) node[above right=4pt, font=\Large] {$P$}; \shade[ball color=spherepurple] (O) circle (0.22); \node[above left=6pt, font=\Large] at (O) {$q$}; \draw[<->, >=latex, semithick, black!80] (30:1.3) arc (30:90:1.3); \node[font=\Large] at (60:1.65) {$\theta$}; \node[font=\Large, below left=6pt] at (1, 0, 1) {$\varphi$}; \end{tikzpicture} \end{document}

Consider the code: \documentclass{book} \usepackage{graphicx} \usepackage{tikz} \usetikzlibrary{decorations.markings} \begin{document} \thispagestyle{empty} \begin{center} \begin{tikzpicture} \fill[red!55!black] rectangle (6,8); \draw[ decoration={markings, mark=between positions 0 and 1 step 1/12 with { \node {\textcolor{yellow}{\rule{0.35in}{.65mm}}}; } }, decorate ] (3,4) ellipse (2cm and 3cm); \end{tikzpicture} \end{center} \end{document} which produces QUESTION: How may I display each of these twelve line segments so that they are pointed in their relative angular direction from the center? In other words, if we call the line segment farthest to the right the first line segment---it will be displayed as is. The second line segment (being the one immediately above it) will be pointed in a direction 30 degrees above the horizontal. Proceeding in a counterclockwise direction, the next angle will be pointed 60 degrees ... and so forth. I compile the code with xelatex. Thank you.

The following (listoftheorems.tex) uses the command \listoftheorems provided by the thmtools package: \documentclass{article} \usepackage{hyperref} \usepackage{amsthm} \usepackage{thmtools} \declaretheorem{theorem} \begin{document} \begin{theorem}[Euclid] For every prime $p$, there is a prime $p'>p$. \end{theorem} \listoftheorems \end{document} Compiled to PDF, it gives a \section* containing a numbered list of theorems. But when I compile the document to HTML (make4ht listoftheorems.tex), the list of theorems is empty.

For some reasons, I have to work with plain LuaTeX. All this while, I have used LuaLaTeX with fontspec and moving to LuaTeX is not exactly easy. I am getting surprised by LuaTeX's behaviour. For example, let's have a look at the following code: \input luaotfload.sty \font\main={NewCM10-Book:+onum,+cv06,+liga} \font\deva={Mukta-Light:Language=Marathi,Script=Devanagari} \main hello world 1234567890 {\deva निरंजन ल श} \bye When I run the exact same code multiple times (with the same terminal command, i.e., luatex test.tex), I sometimes get: which is incorrect. Sometimes I get: which is partly correct (the special linguistic forms of Marathi are not rendered). Sometimes, with the same code, I have gotten the following which is fully correct: I mean, what? I chose this particular MWE because this is a typical setup in most of my PDF files. NewCM10-Book with old style numbers and old style one (provided by +cv06) and Mukta-Light for Marathi text. I added the features on purpose to show that in both the screenshots, multiple features are working correctly for NewCM10, but in some compilations, it is breaking for Mukta. I compared the log of both correct and incorrect output and the only difference was in the byte size reported by "Output written on test.pdf (1 page, 17621 bytes)". Rest everything was okay. What exactly could be happening? Note that this is happening with a fully updated TeX Live 2026 on a GNU Linux machine.

From my previous question here, I wanted a way to be able to write foreign scripts directly in math mode in LuaLaTeX while having different fonts for rm, sf, and tt. niru's answer provided what I wanted, but I wanted to wrap it all in a command like egreg's answer. When I rewrote niru's answer in the style of egreg's, foreign fonts don't render in text mode. I believe the problem lies here: \babelfont[#1]{rm}[NFSSFamily = {#1rm},#3]{#2} \babelfont[#1]{sf}[NFSSFamily = {#1sf},#5]{#4} \babelfont[#1]{tt}[NFSSFamily = {#1tt},#7]{#6} Anyhow, here is the code I'm using: \documentclass{article} \usepackage{babel} \usepackage{unicode-math} \usepackage{xcolor} \ExplSyntaxOn % Resetting math fonts with \rmfamily \hook_gput_code:nnn { cmd / rmfamily / before } { . } { % English \mathversion { rm } } % Resetting math fonts with \sffamily \hook_gput_code:nnn { cmd / sffamily / before } { . } { % English \mathversion { sf } } % Resetting math fonts with \ttfamily \hook_gput_code:nnn { cmd / ttfamily / before } { . } { % English \mathversion { tt } } \hook_gput_code:nnn { begindocument / end } { . } { \mathversion { rm } } % \enableblockformath{symbolic name}{rm font}[rm further options]{sf font}[sf further options]{tt font}[tt further options]{blocks} \NewDocumentCommand{\enableblockformath}{mmO{}mO{}mO{}m} {% #1 = symbolic name % #2 = rm font % #3 = rm further options % #4 = sf font % #5 = sf further options % #6 = tt font % #7 = tt further options % #8 = blocks % Loading language \babelprovide[import,onchar={ids fonts}]{#1} % Loading fonts \babelfont[#1]{rm}[NFSSFamily = {#1rm},#3]{#2} \babelfont[#1]{sf}[NFSSFamily = {#1sf},#5]{#4} \babelfont[#1]{tt}[NFSSFamily = {#1tt},#7]{#6} % Resetting math fonts with \rmfamily \hook_gput_code:nnn { cmd / rmfamily / before } { . } { \clist_map_inline:nn {#8} { \__egreg_blocksformath:nnn {#1} {##1} {rm} } } % Resetting math fonts with \sffamily \hook_gput_code:nnn { cmd / sffamily / before } { . } { \clist_map_inline:nn {#8} { \__egreg_blocksformath:nnn {#1} {##1} {sf} } } % Resetting math fonts with \ttfamily \hook_gput_code:nnn { cmd / ttfamily / before } { . } { \clist_map_inline:nn {#8} { \__egreg_blocksformath:nnn {#1} {##1} {tt} } } \hook_gput_code:nnn { begindocument / end } { . } { \clist_map_inline:nn {#8} { \__egreg_blocksformath:nnn {#1} {##1} {rm} } } \DeclareSymbolFont{#1rm}{TU}{#1rm}{m}{n} \DeclareSymbolFont{#1sf}{TU}{#1sf}{m}{n} \DeclareSymbolFont{#1tt}{TU}{#1tt}{m}{n} } \cs_new_protected:Nn \__egreg_blocksformath:nnn { \seq_set_split:Nnn \l_tmpa_seq {-} {#2} \int_step_inline:nnn {\seq_item:Nn \l_tmpa_seq {1}} {\seq_item:Nn \l_tmpa_seq {2}} { \Umathcode ##1 = "0 ~ \use:c {sym#1#3} ~ ##1 } } \ExplSyntaxOff \babelprovide[import,main,onchar={ids fonts}]{english} \babelfont{rm}[Color = {red}]{NewCM10-Book.otf} \babelfont{sf}[Color = {green}]{NewCMSans10-Book.otf} \babelfont{tt}[Color = {blue}]{NewCMMono10-Book.otf} \setmathfont[version = {rm}, Color = {red}]{NewCMMath-Book.otf} \setmathfont[version = {sf}, Color = {green}]{NewCMSansMath-Regular.otf} \setmathfont[version = {tt}, Color = {blue}]{NewCMSansMath-Regular.otf} \enableblockformath{japanese}{HaranoAjiMincho-Regular.otf}[Color = {red}]{HaranoAjiGothic-Regular.otf}[Color = {green}]{HaranoAjiGothic-Regular.otf}[Color = {blue}]{"3040-"30FF,"4E00-"9FFF} \enableblockformath{thai}{NotoSerifThai-Regular.ttf}[Color = {red}]{NotoSansThai-Regular.ttf}[Color = {green}]{NotoSansThai-Regular.ttf}[Color = {blue}]{"0E00-"0E7F} \begin{document} English language ภาษาไทย 日本語 $x+y=ก+ข=あ+い$ \sffamily English language ภาษาไทย 日本語 $x+y=ก+ข=あ+い$ \ttfamily English language ภาษาไทย 日本語 $x+y=ก+ข=あ+い$ \end{document}

With tcolorbox you can code LaTeX and shot the result, as you can see in the first box. Is that possible with Rscript?. \documentclass[12pt]{article} \usepackage{geometry} \usepackage{parskip} \usepackage{amsmath,mathtools} \usepackage{tcolorbox} \tcbuselibrary{listings} \tcbset{listing engine=listings} \tcbuselibrary{minted} \begin{document} \begin{tcblisting}{colback=red!5!white,colframe=red!75!black} This is a \LaTeX\ example which displays the text as source code and in compiled form. \hfill $x=\dfrac{-b\pm\sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}$ \end{tcblisting} %\tcbset{listing engine=Rscript} \begin{tcblisting}{colback=red!5!white,colframe=red!75!black}[language=Rscript] a<-sample(1:24,5,replace=TRUE) mean(a) barplot(a) \end{tcblisting} \end{document}

I am not using \cftsubsubsecindent 0pt so the following question did not help me figure why How to correctly indent a local table of contents with etoc? This is my MWE \documentclass[12pt,titlepage]{article}% \usepackage[titles]{tocloft} \usepackage{etoc} \newcommand{\makeLocalSectionToc} { \begingroup % Keeps layout changes isolated to just this local TOC \etocsetnexttocdepth{2} \etocsettocstyle{}{}% Completely removes "Local contents" and saves space \localtableofcontents \endgroup % Restores standard settings immediately after printing } \newcommand{\makeLocalSubsectionToc} { \begingroup % Keeps layout changes isolated to just this local TOC \etocsetnexttocdepth{3} \etocsettocstyle{}{}% Completely removes "Local contents" and saves space \localtableofcontents \endgroup % Restores standard settings immediately after printing } \newcommand{\makeLocalSubsubsectionToc} { \begingroup % Keeps layout changes isolated to just this local TOC \etocsetnexttocdepth{4} \etocsettocstyle{}{}% Completely removes "Local contents" and saves space \localtableofcontents \endgroup % Restores standard settings immediately after printing } \begin{document} \section{First order differential equations}% \makeLocalSectionToc \subsection{Algorithm charts} \makeLocalSubsectionToc \subsubsection{First chart}% \makeLocalSubsubsectionToc \paragraph{A} text \paragraph{B} text \end{document} compiled with lualatex Is the way the commands are defined not correct? Update Thanks to answers below. Here is the after and before result. I find having local toc's start at same offset better to look at it. Ofcourse this is personal choice. Someone else might think the way it was looks better. This uses \setlength{\cftparaindent}{20pt} for everyting.

I'm creating a table in LaTeX with images and multi-line text in one column. The text in the "Observaciones" (Observations) column is overflowing outside the table boundaries and not wrapping properly within the cell. The third row's text wraps correctly, but the first two rows' text extends beyond the table width. I'm using \makecell[l] but it's not containing the text properly. How can I ensure the text stays within the cell boundaries and wraps properly regardless of content length? All rows should align at the top with text contained within the column width. The images sizes are 1257x1262 px \documentclass{article} \usepackage{geometry} \usepackage{makecell} \usepackage{graphicx} \geometry{ letterpaper, margin=3cm } \setlength{\marginparwidth}{2cm} \begin{document} \begin{table}[H] \centering \small \begin{tabular}{ >{\raggedright\arraybackslash}m{2cm} >{\centering\arraybackslash}m{3.4cm} >{\centering\arraybackslash}m{3.4cm} >{\raggedright\arraybackslash}m{6cm} } \hline \textbf{Fase} & \textbf{$L_1$} & \textbf{$L_3$} & \textbf{Observaciones} \\ \hline Poros & \includegraphics[width=3.3cm]{example-image} & \includegraphics[width=3.3cm]{example-image} & \makecell[tl]{ $N$: 127,090\\ $P_j$: 1.52\\ $T_G$: -1.16\\ Fuerte linealidad vertical } \\ \hline Óxido & \includegraphics[width=3.3cm]{example-image} & \includegraphics[width=3.3cm]{example-image} & \makecell[tl]{ $N$: 2,228\\ $P_j$: 1.09\\ $T_G$: -0.18\\ Débil anisotropía } \\ \hline Plagioclasa & \includegraphics[width=3.3cm]{example-image} & \includegraphics[width=3.3cm]{example-image} & \makecell[tl]{ $N$: 1,065\\ $P_j$: 1.29\\ $T_G$: -0.73\\ Orientación preferencial moderada sin embargo, se concentra en el eje Z } \\ \hline \end{tabular} \caption{Análisis de orientación de fases de la muestra L187.} \label{tab:stereonets_l187} \end{table} \end{document}

How can I obtain the hollowed-out sphere effect? The drawing above is my original done many years before. \documentclass{article} \usepackage{tikz} \usetikzlibrary{arrows.meta, calc, positioning, shapes.geometric} \begin{document} \begin{tikzpicture}[ scale=1.2, axis/.style={thick, ->} ] \coordinate (O) at (0, 0); \coordinate (X) at (-2, -2.3); \coordinate (Y) at (5.5, 0); \coordinate (Z) at (0, 4); \coordinate (P) at (3.1, 1.3); \draw[axis] (O) -- (X) node[left, font=\large, xshift=-3pt] {$x$}; \draw[axis] (O) -- (Y) node[below, font=\large, yshift=-3pt] {$y$}; \draw[axis] (O) -- (Z) node[left, font=\large, xshift=-3pt] {$z$}; \begin{scope} \shade[ball color=gray!30!white, opacity=0.85] (O) circle (0.9); \draw[gray!60, thin] (O) circle (0.9); \fill[gray!60!black, opacity=0.9] plot[smooth cycle, tension=0.7] coordinates { ($(O)+(-0.2, 0.4)$) ($(O)+(0.5, 0.5)$) ($(O)+(0.6, -0.4)$) ($(O)+(0.1, -0.6)$) ($(O)+(-0.3, -0.3)$) }; \shade[inner color=black!80, outer color=gray!70!black, opacity=0.5] plot[smooth cycle, tension=0.7] coordinates { ($(O)+(-0.2, 0.4)$) ($(O)+(0.5, 0.5)$) ($(O)+(0.6, -0.4)$) ($(O)+(0.1, -0.6)$) ($(O)+(-0.3, -0.3)$) }; \end{scope} \fill[black] (O) circle (0.07) node[below, yshift=-4pt, font=\large] {$O$}; \draw[->, >=Stealth, shorten >= 2.5pt, shorten <= 2pt] (O) -- (P) node[midway, above, yshift=2pt, font=\large] {$r$}; \fill[black] (P) circle (0.08) node[above, yshift=3pt, font=\large] {$P$}; \node[right, font=\Large\itshape, xshift=2pt, yshift=-2pt] at (P) {$m$}; \node[below, font=\large] at (0.2, -0.95) {$M$}; \end{tikzpicture} \end{document}

I don't understand why there is a diagonal. \documentclass[tikz,border=12pt]{standalone} \begin{document} \begin{tikzpicture} \node [draw=red] (A) at (1,1) {A}; \draw (0,0) |- (A) |- cycle; \end{tikzpicture} \end{document} Expected output \begin{tikzpicture} \node [draw=red] (A) at (1,1) {A}; \draw (0,0) |- (A) |- (0,0); \end{tikzpicture} Edit Considering the following code. \begin{tikzpicture} \node [draw=red] (A) at (1,1) {A}; \draw (0,0) |- (A) |- cycle; \end{tikzpicture} Suppose there were two separate paths within a single \draw command: first path: (0,0) |- (A.west) second path: (A.south) |- cycle In that interpretation, cycle seems to have two contradictory behaviors: It remembers (0,0) from the first path and uses it as the destination of |- in the second path. However, it also treats (A.south) as the starting point of the second path instead of (0,0). Am I misunderstanding how cycle is supposed to work?

Using texlive 2025 (distributed by archlinux) user-defined macros are rendered 'correctly' calling make4ht -ul test.tex "mathml,mathjax" With texlive 2026 (again archlinux package) and the same call, some things render correctly and others don't. MWE: \documentclass{article} \usepackage{siunitx} \usepackage{amssymb} \newcommand{\ilfrac}[2]{{}\sp{#1}\!/\!\sb{#2}} \newcommand{\ft}{\mathop{\mathcal{FT}}} \newcommand{\ift}{\mathop{\mathcal{FT}\sp{-1}}} \begin{document} %%% first equation %%% \[ \ift{\left[a(x)\right](f)} \] %%% second equation %%% \[ \ft \neq \ift \] %%% third equation %%% \[ \ift \neq \ft \] %%% fourth equation %%% \[ \chi(f) = \ift{\left[a(x)\right](f)} = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} a(x) \exp{\left[i 2 \pi x f \right]} dx \] %%% fifth equation %%% \[ \ilfrac{a}{b} = \qty{3}{\mm} \] \end{document} In the above, the first, third and fourth equations render correctly, while the second displays as 'Math input error' (unexpected text node -1) and the fifth renders 'msup'. I do get a domfilter warning about an Unbalanced Tag (/msup). If I comment out the fifth equation this warning is suppressed, but the second equation still displays 'Math input error'. I can do more test but am unsure where to start. Edit As per my comments below and to the solution from Michael.h21 I've dug further into the problem. It turns out that in my real document, near all the maths were rendered as 'Math Input Error' due to how I (re)-configure \chapter to include an image file. I've created an MWE with a test.tex file: \documentclass{book} \usepackage{graphicx} \makeatletter \global\let\loutcme\@empty \global\let\expphoto\@empty \newcommand{\loutcome}[1]{\gdef\loutcme{#1}} \newcommand{\experimentphoto}[1]{\gdef\expphoto{#1}} \makeatother \begin{document} \loutcome{This is the learning outcome} \experimentphoto{./path/to/pdf/or/png/or/jpeg} \chapter{A test} \section{A section in the chapter} \[ a = b \] \end{document} and a test.cfg file \Preamble{xhtml,mathml,mathjax} \Configure{chapter} {\ifvmode\IgnorePar\fi\EndP\HCode{<section class="chapter">}} {\ifvmode\IgnorePar\fi\EndP\HCode{</section>}} {% \ifvmode\IgnorePar\fi\EndP\HCode{<div class="expphoto">} %%% The line below is the culprit %%% %%% If it is commented out and 'some text' is commented in %%% %%% the conversion renders the subsequent equation w/o error %%% \ifvmode\IgnorePar\fi\EndP\includegraphics{\expphoto} % Some text. \ifvmode\IgnorePar\fi\EndP\HCode{</div>} \ifvmode\IgnorePar\fi\EndP\HCode{<h2 class="chapterHead">} \TitleMark \HCode{<br />}} {\HCode{</h2>} \ifvmode\IgnorePar\fi\EndP\HCode{<div class="learningoutcome">}\par\ShowPar \loutcme \ifvmode\IgnorePar\fi\EndP\HCode{</div><br />}\par\ShowPar} \Css{.learningoutcome { font-family: sans-serif; padding-top: 1ex; padding-bottom: 1ex; border-top-style: solid; border-bottom-style: solid; }} \Css{.expphoto img { width: 100\%; aspect-ratio: 5 / 2; object-fit: cover; } } \begin{document} \EndPreamble and make4ht is called with make4ht -l -c test.cfg test.tex "mathml,mathjax" I've liberally applied \ifvmode\IgnorePar\fi trying to avoid warnings, but admit I have no idea if I am doing this correctly. To summarize: using \includegraphics in the configuration of the chapter makes subsequent math(jax) render as 'Math Input Error'. Thanks for your attention.

Sorry if anything I ask or provide is inappropriate; I am new to TeX Stack Exchange. I am writing a Traditional Chinese LaTeX document. Sometimes I will need commentary in either align or equation, which is, of course, in Chinese. I usually use \text{} for the commentary, but they look cluttered and hard to read. However, removing the \text{} around the commentary simply makes the commentary disappear in the output. Is there a workaround? Re-defining \text{} won't help me, 'cause it'll still look cluttered. For reference I am on https://overleaf.com, using XeLaTeX. \documentclass{article} \usepackage{xeCJK} \setCJKmainfont{Noto Sans CJK TC} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} This works: \begin{align} 1 + 1 &= 2 \text{ 一個人和一隻狗合起來是兩個東西}\\ 2 + 3 &= 5 \text{ 兩個人和三隻狗合起來是五個東西} \end{align} This doesn't: \begin{align} 1 + 1 &= 2 \quad 一個人和一隻狗合起來是兩個東西\\ 2 + 3 &= 5 \quad 兩個人和三隻狗合起來是五個東西 \end{align} \end{document} EDIT By "cluttered" I mean the code, not the output. Also, I would like to clarify that without \text{}, the commentary simply doesn't get displayed in the output at all, and I am looking for a way to de-clutter my code while getting the output to also work. UPDATE @Explorer suggested that I use LuaLaTeX to compile, but free Overleaf only gives 20 seconds of compile time, and LuaLaTeX exceeds that time even for small documents. Is there a workaround? Or do I have to stick to cluttered code?

I have the following code example taken from texdoc lua-ul: \documentclass{article} \usepackage[paperheight=5cm,paperwidth=10cm]{geometry} \usepackage{lipsum} \usepackage{xcolor,luacolor} \usepackage[soul]{lua-ul} \newunderlinetype\beginUnderWavy[\number\dimexpr1ex]{\cleaders\hbox{% \setlength\unitlength{.3ex}% \begin{picture}(4,0)(0,1) \thicklines \color{magenta}% \qbezier(0,0)(1,1)(2,0) \qbezier(2,0)(3,-1)(4,0) \end{picture}% }} \NewDocumentCommand\underWavy{+m}{{\beginUnderWavy#1}} \pagestyle{empty} \begin{document} \lipsum[2][1-5] \underWavy{Hello world Hello world Hello world Hello world Hello world Hello world Hello world Hello world Hello world} \lipsum[2][1-3] \end{document} However, when we zoom in, there exists glitch, but in texdoc lua-ul, the wavyline were smooth? Is this a bug or feature? Or maybe I missed some parameters setting?

Earlier this year I reported what appears to be a regression in LuaLaTeX's \mathit behaviour that was introduced in TeX Live 2026. The original discussion with the LuaTeX developers is here: https://tug.org/pipermail/luatex/2026-April/008187.html In short, the commonly recommended practice of using \mathit{} for multi-letter identifiers produces visually displeasing results with LuaLaTeX v1.24.0 (TeX Live 2026): \documentclass{standalone} \begin{document} \begin{tabular}{ll} \verb!|\emph{different}|! & |\emph{different}| \\ \verb!|$\textit{different}$|! & |$\textit{different}$| \\ \verb!|$\mathit{different}$|! & |$\mathit{different}$| \\ \verb!|$different$|! & |$different$| \\ \end{tabular} \end{document} As far as I understand, the underlying issue has since been fixed in LuaTeX v1.25.8. However, TeX Live generally does not update the LuaTeX binary during the lifetime of a TeX Live release, so this fix is unlikely to reach most TeX Live 2026 users until the next annual release. Assuming a user is required to use LuaLaTeX (for other reasons), what is the recommended workaround in the meantime? I would prefer not to change all occurrences of \mathit in my sources for what appears to be a temporary regression, and downgrading to TeX Live 2025 also seems like an undesirable solution. Alternatively, is there a practical way to use a newer LuaTeX binary with an existing TeX Live 2026 installation? (I have tried to do so, but I have not managed to get it working.) Thanks!

I am trying to write a simple chemical reaction like this one: I have the MWE below. Can anyone help, please? \documentclass{article} \usepackage{chemfig} \begin{document} Nuclear reaction: \[ \schemestart \chemfig{^{235}U} \arrow{->} \chemfig{^{231}Th} \+ ^4\alpha \schemestop \] \end{document} with the error: ! Missing $ inserted. <inserted text> $ l.16 \schemestop ?

MWE: \documentclass{article} \usepackage{tikz} \begin{document} \begin{tikzpicture} \def\W{9} % width of the rectangle \def\H{15} % height of the rectangle \def\R{0.8} % radius of the inverted corners. \draw[ultra thick, fill=blue!80] (0, \R) arc (180:270:\R) -- (\W-\R, 0) arc (270:360:\R) -- (\W, \H-\R) arc (0:90:\R) -- (\R, \H) arc (90:180:\R) -- cycle; \end{tikzpicture} \end{document} output: How may I modify the code such that all four rounded corners are pointing inward; that is, the rounded part is pointing towards the interior of the figure and not the exterior? Thanks.

I'm trying to make a nice diagram to illustrate partial derivatives for my multivariable class. I have the graph of a function, a plane, the intersection of these in the graph, a tangent line, and some guide lines to show what's occurring, but (presumably because of the order in which they appear in the code) the diagram doesn't respect what object is behind a different object, i.e., the graph is drawn on top of the plane, or the plane is drawn on top of the graph, even though they ``should'' pass through one another. Is there any nice way to make whatever ``should'' be on top be drawn on top without manually finding intersections and having different domains/clip regions for different features? My code so far is below, along with the image that is produced \begin{standalone} \usepackage{tikz} \usepackage{pgfplots} \begin{document} \begin{tikzpicture} \begin{axis}[axis lines = center, xmin = 0, xmax = 3, ymin = 0, ymax = 3, view = {100}{30}, xlabel = {$x$}, ylabel = {$y$}, zlabel = {$z$}, xtick=\empty, ytick=\empty, ztick=\empty, ] % Using f(x,y) = 2 - (x-2)^3 - (y-1.5)^2 %graph \addplot3[ domain =1:3, y domain = 0.5:2.5,surf,colormap/viridis, opacity=0.9] {-(x-2)^3 - (y-1.5)^2 + 2}; %plane \draw[fill = blue!90, color = blue, opacity = 0.3] (2,0,0)--(2,3,0)-- (2,3,3) node[black, above, opacity = 0.9] {$x=a$}--(2,0,3)--cycle ; %intersection of line and plane \addplot3[domain = 0.5:2.5, blue, samples y = 1, thick] ({2},{x},{2 - (2-2)^3 - (x-1.5)^2}); %tangent line \addplot3[black, thick, domain = -1:1.23] ({2},{x+1},{-2*(1-1.5)*x + 2 - (1-1.5)^2}); %point of tangancy \draw[fill = black] (2,1, {2 - (1-1.5)^2}) circle (2pt); %guide lines for point \draw[dashed, thick] (2,0,0)--(2,1,0) node[below] {$(a,b,0)$}--(0,1,0); \draw[dashed, thick,] (2,1,0) -- (2,1,{2 - (1-1.5)^2}); \end{axis} \end{tikzpicture} \end{document}

Ok. Hear me out. I had this problem in the earlier versions of TeXLive, but was never able to fully understand where it is coming from, and what exactly is the solution. The only workaround was to perform a clean install of TeXLive. I am on Windows 11 64bit, TeXLive 2026. I tend to update my TeXLive occasionally to catch up with the possible updates on the packages that I am interested. Just couple of days ago, I checked the updates again using tlshell.exe (TLShell TeX Live Manager), and the update list that is shown in the following picture came up. A typical update of packages in TeXLive is not like this. Note that all the updateble packages have the version number of 79618. Also note that there is an update of "tlmgr" My first question is: What kind of update is this? Is this some sort of a major update of the TeXLive system for the purpose of some sort of a clean-up, instead of individual package updates? I have updated "tlmgr" first, and updated all the packages. But then, I have this problem of "Back end gone. Last command: info --data name,remoterev,rcat-version, category,shortdesc" Then the tlshell.exe quits on me... I have tried many many things to get rid of this error, but did not work, so just out of curiosity, I uninstalled TeXLive and did a clean installation. To my surprise, the error still occurs. So, this is telling me that the TeXLive update that was recently rolled-out has an issue. Am I right? I had this issue last year and could not solve it back then. So I am really wondering what exactly this problem is about. If anybody can direct me to a page with an explanation and a possible solution, that would be also fine. Also, what is the suggested action here when we see this sort of update list? Should we just wait for TUG to fix the problem for a couple of days, without performing an update? Or is this related to my own TeXLive setup?

I'm using tcolorbox to create a lecture material with examples but can't manage breaks and positioning. Can anyone help me, please? I provide a MEW below. \documentclass[12pt, openright, twoside, a4paper, chapter=TITLE]{memoir} \usepackage[a4paper, top=30mm, bottom=20mm, left=20mm, right=20mm]{geometry} %--> Language package \usepackage[english]{babel} \usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} \usepackage[T1]{fontenc} \usepackage{lipsum} %--> For multicolumns: \usepackage{multicol} \setlength{\columnsep}{5mm} \usepackage{paracol} %... allows empty column %--> Packages for images and floats: \usepackage{graphicx, float} \newcounter{example}[chapter] \renewcommand{\theexample}{\thechapter.\arabic{example}} \usepackage[breakable, skins]{tcolorbox} \newtcolorbox[use counter=example]{example}[1][]{% %--> TITLE SETTINGS %... boxed head enhanced jigsaw, %... box style boxed title style={size=small,colback=white}, %... title text title={\bfseries Example~\thetcbcounter}, %... title color coltitle=black, %... head position attach boxed title to top left={ xshift=2mm, yshift=-\tcboxedtitleheight/2 }, %--> BOX SETTINGS %... frame line widths boxrule=1pt, rightrule=0pt, leftrule=0pt, %... background color colback=gray!10, %... shaddow drop shadow={gray!50!white}, %... automatic breaking enforce breakable, pad at break=3mm, %--> TEXT SETTINGS %... margin widths boxsep=0mm, top=5mm, %... text font size fontupper=\small, %... keep paragraphs similar to the text parbox=false, #1 % use the option [break at=85mm/0mm] if necessary } \begin{document} \begin{multicols}{2} \begin{example}[label=X: free fall, break at=350mm/0mm] \lipsum[1] \begin{figure}[H] \centering \includegraphics[width=4cm]{example-image-a} \end{figure} \lipsum[2] \end{example} \lipsum[3] \begin{example} \lipsum[4] \begin{figure}[H] \centering \includegraphics[width=4cm]{example-image-b} \end{figure} \lipsum[5] \begin{figure}[H] \centering \includegraphics[width=4cm]{example-image-c} \end{figure} \lipsum[6-7] \end{example} \section*{Non numbered section} \lipsum[1] \begin{example}[label=X: mass-spring] \lipsum[2] \begin{figure}[H] \centering \includegraphics[width=4cm]{example-image-a} \end{figure} \lipsum[3] \end{example} \lipsum[4] \end{multicols} \end{document}

I want to plot a graph for this below picture I already tried but the graph wasn't smooth. This is the graph that I tried to plot Here's my code : \documentclass{article} \usepackage{tikz} \begin{document} \begin{center} \begin{tikzpicture}[x=1.2cm, y=0.7cm] \draw[thick, ->, >=stealth] (-2, 0) -- (6, 0) node[right] {X}; \draw[thick, ->, >=stealth] (0, -3.5) -- (0, 6.5) node[above] {Y}; \draw[thick, <->, >=stealth, color=black!80!blue] plot[smooth, tension=0.7] coordinates {(-1.5, 1.5) (0, 5) (2, 0) (4, -2) (4.8, 3)}; \fill (0, 5) circle (2.5pt); \node[above right] at (0, 5) {$(0, 5)$}; \fill (2, 0) circle (2.5pt); \node[above right] at (2, 0) {$(2, 0)$}; \fill (4, -2) circle (2.5pt); \node[below, yshift=-2pt] at (4, -2) {$(4, -2)$}; \node[above left] at (5.2, 3) {$y = f(x)$}; \end{tikzpicture} \end{center} \end{document}

(This is a follow-up of How to ignore space in sorting order of biblatex + biber?.) At least in French, spaces should be ignored in sorting order of strings. But, as shown by the following MCE, that's not by default the case with expl3 string comparison: just as “AB”, “A B” should be considered after (here >) “AA” in the lexicographic order. How to fix this problem? \documentclass{article} \begin{document} \ExplSyntaxOn \begin{itemize} \item \str_compare:nNnTF {AB} > {AA} {true} {false} % returns true \item \str_compare:nNnTF {A~B} > {AA} {true} {false} % returns false \end{itemize} \ExplSyntaxOff \end{document}

I have tried several approaches, including adding \mkern inside the \slhat command, but I still haven't been able to fix the spacing around \slhat{\brcurs} (the slanted-hat version of Griffiths' italic accented (r)). I would like the spacing to be correct both before and after the symbol, so that it behaves like a standard mathematical accent. \documentclass{article} \usepackage{newtxtext} \usepackage{newtxmath} \usepackage{bm} \usepackage{mathtools} \newcommand{\genericrcurs}[1]{% \text{% \resizebox{!}{0.9\fontcharht\font`x}{% \includegraphics[trim=20 0 140 40]{#1}% }% }% } \NewDocumentCommand{\rcurs}{}{\mathord{\genericrcurs{ScriptR}}} \NewDocumentCommand{\brcurs}{}{\mathord{\genericrcurs{BoldR}}} \NewDocumentCommand{\hrcurs}{}{\,\mathit{\hat{\!\brcurs}}} \usepackage{l3draw} \ExplSyntaxOn \NewDocumentCommand{\xslantobject}{mm} { \draw_begin: \draw_transform_xslant:n { #2 } \hbox_set:Nn \l_tmpa_box { #1 } \draw_box_use:N \l_tmpa_box \draw_end: } \NewDocumentCommand{\slhat}{m} { \mathord{ \mkern-5mu \vbox{ \offinterlineskip \halign{\hfil##\hfil\cr \xslantobject{$\hat{\phantom{x}}$}{0.3}\cr \noalign{\kern-.95ex} $#1$\cr } } \mkern0mu } } \ExplSyntaxOff \begin{document} \[ {S}_{a}^{\mathbf{(CGS)}}=\frac{q^2 a^2 \sin^2\theta}{4 \pi c^{3}\rcurs^2}\boldsymbol{[}\slhat{\brcurs}\boldsymbol{]} \] \begin{equation}\label{rayd49} \begin{aligned} & |\slhat{\brcurs}\times\{(\slhat{\brcurs}-\beta \hat{z})\times\hat{\mathbf{x}}\}|^2\\ & = |\slhat{\brcurs}-\beta\hat{\mathbf{z}}|^2 (\slhat{\brcurs}\cdot\hat{\mathbf{x}})^2+(1-\beta \hat{\mathbf{z}}\cdot\slhat{\brcurs})^2 -2 (\slhat{\brcurs}\cdot\hat{\mathbf{x}})(1-\beta\hat{\mathbf{z}}\cdot\slhat{\brcurs})\{ \hat{\mathbf{x}}\cdot (\slhat{\brcurs}-\beta\hat{\mathbf{z}})\}= \\ & = |\slhat{\brcurs}-\beta \hat{\mathbf{z}}|^2(\slhat{\brcurs}\cdot\hat{\mathbf{x}})^2+(1-\beta \hat{\mathbf{z}}\cdot\slhat{\brcurs})^2 -2 (\slhat{\brcurs}\cdot\hat{\mathbf{x}}) (1-\beta\hat{\mathbf{z}}\cdot\slhat{\brcurs}) (\hat{\mathbf{x}}\cdot\slhat{\brcurs}) \end{aligned} \end{equation} \end{document}

At least in French, spaces should be ignored in sorting order of strings. But, as shown by the following MCE, that's not by default the case with biblatex + biber: just as “AB”, “A B” should appear after “AA”. How to fix this problem? \begin{filecontents}[overwrite]{\jobname.bib} @article{ab, author = {A B, Jane}, } @article{aa, author = {AA, Jane}, } \end{filecontents} \documentclass[french]{article} \usepackage{biblatex} \usepackage{babel} \addbibresource{\jobname.bib} \nocite{*} \begin{document} \printbibliography \end{document} The original, realistic, case is the following one where “El Kacimi” should appear after “Eliahou” (in “El Kacimi”, “El” should not be considered as a prefix). \begin{filecontents}[overwrite]{\jobname.bib} @article{elka, author = {El Kacimi, Aziz}, } @article{elia, author = {Eliahou, Shalom}, } \end{filecontents} \documentclass[french]{article} \usepackage{biblatex} \usepackage{babel} \addbibresource{\jobname.bib} \nocite{*} \begin{document} \printbibliography \end{document}

I would like to have a tikzcd within tikzpicture. The reason for this is I want to have a standard commutative diagram from tikzcd, but then also put lines, text, and shapes in the "background" of the diagram using tikzpicture treating the diagram as static and without interacting with the diagram at all (allowing for overlap, for example). A solution for tikzpicture within tikzpicture is using \newsavebox, but this doesn't work for tikzcd within tikzpicture. Specifically, \UseRawInputEncoding \documentclass[11pt]{article} \renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{1.05} \usepackage{tikz-cd} \begin{document} \newsavebox{\mybox} \sbox{\mybox}{ \begin{tikzpicture} \end{tikzpicture} } \end{document} compiles, but \UseRawInputEncoding \documentclass[11pt]{article} \renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{1.05} \usepackage{tikz-cd} \begin{document} \newsavebox{\mybox} \sbox{\mybox}{ \begin{tikzcd} A \arrow[r] & B \end{tikzcd} } \end{document} does not compile and throws the following error. Moreover, \UseRawInputEncoding \documentclass[11pt]{article} \renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{1.05} \usepackage{tikz-cd} \begin{document} \newsavebox{\mybox} \sbox{\mybox}{ \begin{tikzpicture} \begin{tikzcd} A \arrow[r] & B \end{tikzcd} \end{tikzpicture} } \end{document} does not compile and throws the following error. How can I have a tikzcd within tikzpicture?